Friday, September 3, 2010

X-ray not acurate than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose hip and pelvic fractures

Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 14:52
This news item was posted in Arthritis and Inflammation, General Health, Healthy News, Journal category and has 0 Comments so far.

In the emergency department, fast diagnosis of pelvic and hip fractures can speed up the patient for appropriate treatment, such as medication and possibility to have surgical management.
Also fast diagnosis of those fractures could reduce the rate of hospital admissions among other patients who have no fracture.

However, using X-ray for diagnosing could missed number of fractures compare with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning result.

Despite side effects related to MRI may occur in further as our previous archive, for emergency treatment, fast diagnosis can help patient to get immediate treatment especially for older population which is hip fracture can lead to high morbidity and mortality.

Estimated report said that 12% - 37% mortality from hip fracture in 1 year.

Comparison diagnosing result between MRI and X-ray study recently investigated by researcher from the Department of Radiology of Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Matthew Kirby, MD and Charles Spritzer, MD from the Duke University Medical Center, write as April issue in the American Journal of Roengenology from the result of their prospective study in 92 patients (77 women and 14 men) who arrived at the Duke emergency department with pain or suspected trauma (of 65 patients) with median age 70.8 years, and who later had a MRI scanning between July 2005 and June 2008.

The results;
- 13 patient or 14% of patients detected had 6 hip fracture and 7 pelvic fracture by MRI but not in X-ray
- 11 patient or 12% of patient ’suggested’ the presence of fractures by X-ray, but clearly not in MRI
- 15 patients (16%) with X-rays that did reveal fractures had MRIs that depicted additional breaks missed by X-ray.

From 59 patients showed no fracture with MRIs, of 43 patients (73%) revealed other conditions such as inflammation of the part of the hip–trochanteric bursa, muscle edema and tears, and hamstring tendinopathy.

As a conclusion the author write, “We found a large number of both false-positive and false-negative diagnoses based on radiographic findings alone. Use of MRI has a substantial advantage in the detection of pelvic and femoral fractures, helping to steer patients to appropriate medical and surgical therapy.”

Related posts:

  1. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo Provera) linked to an increased likelihood of fractures Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (a hormone for contraception branded with Depo...
  2. The probability use of CT imaging among children patient who had proptosis and extraocular muscles paralysis Children who had eye anteriorly bulging out of the orbit...
  3. New finding risks found for HIV patients from their therapies, Low Bone Mineral Density and Fragility Fracture HIV patients should be aware that their have to face...
  4. Comparable suggestion between Breast-specific Gama Imaging vs MRI to detect additional occult breast cancer lesion A recent conclusion about detection ability of additional occult breast...
  5. Be careful with diabetes type 2 oral medication side effects for older women, increase risk of osteoporosis, fracture, and congestive heart failure For older women, risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture already...

Visitor Guidance :::MOUSE OVER YOUR POINTER TO THE HOMEOPATHIC AND NATURAL IMAGE PRODUCTS FOR SHORT PRODUCTS DESCRIPTION (YOUR JAVASCRIPT BROWSER MUST BE ENABLE) OR SEE IN ABOVE SUB-CATEGORIES::: Return to HOMEPAGE.

Tweet this post
twit..twit

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed for this story.